Can anyone say... ??? person?

[MrAdmiralX]

Originally Posted by Arcadian Empire

Oh, but I've been to a strip club. I too am apparently a rape supporter

Ah, gotta love ??? people.

mind blown

[Legionnaire]

She's just rationalizing how to hate all men. Because according to that we are all rapists or rape supporters.

Also, she doesn't have a clue about basic human biology.

[Watcher]

Originally Posted by Legionnaire

She's just rationalizing how to hate all men. Because according to that we are all rapists or rape supporters.

Also, she doesn't have a clue about basic human biology.

and boom goes the dynamite

[Arcadian Empire]

Following Legionnaire's lead:

He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion. (I got hugged by a girl at Year 8 camp - I assume that hugging is sexual engagement of some sort and that she was perhaps a bit high to even do such a thing BECAUSE THAT'S NEVER HAPPENED TO ME BEFORE =()
He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.
He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man. (I think I watched a documentary on this before and I yelled out something to that effect)
He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked. (Hey, when I was playing GTA San Andreas, that stupid woman driver put her car in front of my way which meant I had to RESTART the mission where I had to get Officer Tenpenny
He has procured a prostitute. (I admit to doing it once on GTA: III =()
He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes. (the movie Pretty Woman made me think differently about them... )
He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional. (Totally, like I give them a good time and they give me memories to last a life time! =) )
He has gone to a strip club.
He is anti-abortion. (Sometimes... because killing is bad!)
He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available. (Choice is good)
He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.” (Aren't they all?)
He watches pornography in which women are depicted. (I classify my thread 'I'm not sure what to think' is pornographic in nature)
He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present. (I classify the GIF in the 'I'm not sure what to think' as a struggle for power between pink fleshy object and throat
He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man. (I've never seen a girl seduce a guy in non-revealing clothing - hence, the result follows)
He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed. (Fine, I admit I chuckled at the joke: "A woman is run over. Whose fault is it? The man - he shouldn't be driving in the kitchen)
He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects (So I was watching the Pirates of Penzance - which I enjoyed - and yeah... the daughters of the major general were treated pretty much as objects (probably because they were clumped as 'Daughters' and not given any name - unless one was one of the lead daughters)
He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification. (I suppose in doing this, I mock the girl who did this)
He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them. (Liberation is good... isn't it?)
He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill. (...or lesbian. But yeah, they're man-haters if they like women, in a certain way)
He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention. (Yeah, have you seen what the Muslims make their wives/daughters wear? Is that not cultural?)
He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men. ('Proceeds in discussions as if the interests of women are the same as of men?' Well, don't we all want to be loved?)
He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s. (Well, yeah - on an airplane I read in the safety manual that if the plane goes down and the oxygen masks come out, I have to put on my mask first before I help out a hypothetical lady next to me. So yeah... that's a philosophical view where a woman's wellbeing is subordinated to a man's I suppose)
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women. (Hmm, well - females don't have a prostate so that 'prostate area' is empty - so I suppose this result follows?)
He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.” (Hell yeah! On WWF programming last week, I saw Kelly Kelly almost get beaten up by Kharma =( )
He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.” (I remember I saw a documentary about these young 12 year olds going into beauty pageants because they wanted to so.... yeah)
He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children. (Uhh, girls are meant to have children - lest the world ends within one generation. What, do you expect guys to start churning out babies?)
He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.” (I remember I said before "I just want someone to cuddle" so... yeah, this result follows)
He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing. (Don't get me started on the criteria for the perfect Mrs. Arcadian )
He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity. (Well, suppose people having sex are termed 'x-ers'. Thus, 'x-ers' is a noun - which classifies an object. QED.
He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them. (Well, we can't have lesbians without women, can't we?)

So I'm reading back at this and I think I may need professional help... because apparently I'm a super duper rape supporter =(

[Watcher]

The fact that she frames it around men only is just..

*face palms*

----------

God reading her follow up comments.

She has no idea about why people even commit rape.

Of course a lot of that has to do with her being sexist but yeah.

Oh and fucking stupid. Being fucking stupid doesn't help.

[Makaveli]

Men get raped to...

[Watcher]

I found one stupider!

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/201...el-like-a-cow/

Hahahaahahahah

Dear god.

What makes me sad is my state is full of these people.

----------

This is the best Arc thread.

I got my laugh today thanks.

[Makaveli]

Oh my god man I am going to troll this woman hard the articles have a comment section, and I can't resist.

[Watcher]

Just ask her if she thinks women can be raped.

I bet she denies your comment being posted.

So much for open mindedness

[bitermer]

Originally Posted by Watcher

I found one stupider!

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/201...el-like-a-cow/

Yay, more stupiderfullnessest